Noahide Movement vs. Community
Why do people refer to the phenomenon of Gentiles coming back to the G-d of Israel as “the Noahide movement.” And why do I think we should stop using this word, movement?
Here are two reasons not to use the word movement, and two reasons to use a different word: community. The Noahide community.
Reason #1 not to use “movement”
Random House Dictionary defines a movement as:
a diffusely organized or heterogeneous group of people or organizations tending toward or favoring a generalized common goal: the antislavery movement; the realistic movement in art, etc.
The word movement does not accurately portray what is going on here.

(bottle rocket flying into the night)
What we have are human beings seeking out the G-d of Israel in order to live a lifestyle in accordance with G-d’s Will and Wisdom, the Torah. This is a lifelong journey for the individual, and an eternal journey for mankind.
Yet the word movement connotes what our Sages called “ahavah sh’teluya ba’davar” - a love that depends on something.
“Any love that depends on something, when that thing ceases, the love will cease. But if it does not depend on anything, it will endure forever…” (Avos 5:19)
A movement depends on attaining their goal. The civil rights movement. Boy did it move! They changed America. And now where are the people marching in the streets? Where are the speeches across America? There are none (no major ones) because the goals were achieved - American law was changed forever.
Are the Noahides part of a movement, then?
I say no. You are not riding a bottle rocket that will fizzle out and pop. Heaven forbid! You are builders, not rocketeers.
Reason #2 not to use “movement”
The word movement, in my opinion, is far too synonymous with “religion.” As pointed out in the Noahide Nations Radio Show (I believe they did, forgive me if I’m wrong), and quoted from Rambam, it is forbidden for Gentiles to create new religions or create new religiously obligatory practices, such as moving the Sabbath from the seventh day of the week to the first day (Sunday), etc.
Hence, voluntarily wearing “Noahide tzitzit” may be okay and even praiseworthy according to the Rav Yoel Schwartz and the guidelines he gave for how to go about it.
The danger, however, is if, ch”v two generations from now Noahide descendants coming to believe that to be a Noahide one is obligated to wear “Noahide tzitzit.” Not only would that be false, it would be forbidden to hold such doctrine!
Although it is sometimes necessary to use the word “religion” or “theology” to describe what it is that guides your life, the word “movement” sounds like a “new hip religion” - as opposed to more appropriate use of these terms by the Oklahoma Bnai Noah Society:
Noachide theology is the same as the theology of Judaism. However, non-Jews are not required to accept all the details of this theology to the extent that Jews are. Observant Noachides are the Non-Jews in Judaism. Just as the Priests, Levites, women etc… have particular Laws given to them at Sinai, so do Noachides have particular Laws and together we all make one True Universal Religion, walking in the Ways of our Creator. [emphasis added -iHN]
We see the the word “movement” is not only inaccurate, but is also a potential stumbling block to the less learned person considering the Noahide community.
Reason #1 for using “community”
Like I said, Noahides are building. They are building a life they want to live, they are building homes to raise children with values from the Torah, they are building a future world of peace amongst all peoples. These are not transient goals that fade with time.
The word “community” better describes the building that is going on, which is really the essence of avodas Hashem - service of G-d. They are not actions that will fade away with the attainment of longterm or short term goals. Rather, they are actions that will blossom over time. A community grows. A community blossoms. A community branches out and forms other like-minded communities.

(a beautifully built, peaceful garden)
This is what I see happening…not a bottle rocket movement.
Reason #2 to use “community”
Although I quoted the OKBNS above, I think it important to clarify what they said in the last line:
…together we all make one True Universal Religion, walking in the Ways of our Creator.
Let us not make the terrible mistake of thinking that “walking together” means intermarriage between Bnei Yisrael and Bnei Noach, Heaven forbid.
Of course every Noahide knows that would be against the Torah. But it’s important to make sure we don’t inadvertantly sew seeds that could later on lead to big problems of intermarriage, ch”v. If we lead ourselves to such a mistake, everything will be for not.
However, if Noahides are a community of people, and Jews are another community of people, then we have two distinct entities that also share common goals, values, and purpose. Separate communities. Similar values.
In Conclusion

(Distinctly different communities, working toward shared goal.)
We see that the word “community” is much more empowering and visionary than the transient word “movement.” Community connotes geographic base, and growth such as with school systems and social networks. Additionally, the word community better ensures that the Noahide path is not adultered into a new religion. And finally, the word community clarifies Bnei Noach as a distinct entity, separate from the Jewish communities with whom they cooperate toward the common goal of walking in the Ways of our Creator.
Addendum
Why has the word movement been used? I have some thoughts. Mostly I think it just happened.




July 3rd, 2009 at 8:38 am
I’ve been catching up on your blog,as this is the first time I’ve seen it. First let me say that I am so pleased to see that there is an explosion of interest in the Sheva Mitzvot! My husband and family have been studying for conversion to Judaism for almost 5 years now and we’ve recently come to the stark and terrifying realization that it’s not appropriate for us. We researched Noahidism at the very outset of our journey, but we felt like it wasn’t going to be fulfilling for us based on the fact that there were almost no structured communities. B’H we’re seeing that that is changing and we’re looking forward to advancing the community.
To my comment: Wearing tzit-tzis- wouldn’t that be something that could create a problem with maris ayin? If someone saw a Noachide wearing tzit-tzis who wasn’t keeping shabbat, for example, they could mistake them for a Jew and therefore “cast a bad eye” on all of Klal Yisrael.
Thank you for your website!
July 3rd, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Hi Sarah,
I’m so happy you are enjoying and hopefully benefiting from iHeartNoahides.com.
The more life-altering a realization is, the more terrifying it can be. You have my admiration.
As to your question on Noahides wearing tzitzis, you’ve prodded me with your comment to finally write up the long overdue post on Bnei Noach wearing tzitzit - which shouldn’t be done, other than possibly in a specific way that hopefully avoids the problem of maris ayin (cast a bad eye). See more on the upcoming post.
IY”H I’ll have it up by the end of the weekend.
Blessings to you and your husband.
Daniel
October 16th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
I was thinking about starting my own Noahide blog but decided to see what was already available before doing so and found “iheartnoahides.com”. I very much appreciate your thoughts on why we should use the term “Noahide Community” instead of “Noahide Movement” and I wholeheartedly agree.
Having been a part of two major religious movements - the “Charismatic Movement” and the “Messianic Jewish Movement” - I have learned the inherent problems and dangers that go along with starting a new movement.
To call the growing Noahide community a movement would indeed constitute founding a new religion which would be against the Torah.
While there is, indeed, much more to learn my prayer is that as more Gentiles come into the understanding that the Torah is the truth for us today, we will find each other within the communities in which we live and work and will begin to study, worship and learn together how to fulfill HaShem’s plan for us.
July 20th, 2010 at 9:34 am
“d finally, the word community clarifies Bnei Noach as a distinct entity, separate from the Jewish communities with whom they cooperate toward the common goal of walking in the Ways of our Creator.”
To walk in the ways of the Creator, one must fulfill what the Creator requires in Tan”kh.
“Noachides” are according to Tan”kh the same thing as goyim (persons not included in the pact with ha-Sheim (the Creator)), and goyim are not promised ha-olam haba (which Christians would call “heaven”) in Tan”kh. One can learn this by studying our glossary entries, particularly Bәnei-Noakh, and consulting an Hebrew concordance to make an exhaustive study of what is prophesied to happen to all goyim.
Quote: “The Nәtzârim Beit-Din were the original Beit-Din who defined the Noakhide Laws as the minimum threshhold requirements to admit a proselyte, thereby enabling him or her to study Torâh with Jews, in the Jewish community, and begin the transition of learning and becoming non-selectively Torâh-observant.” (source: http://www.netzarim.co.il)
The ancient Halakhah is this:
The Noakhide should practise the minimum threshold-requirements, come before a beit-din (implying Orthodox) promising to adhere to that requirements and to start doing his/her utmost to observe the mitzwot in Torah non-selectively; and then study Torâh with Jews, in the Jewish community, and begin the transition of learning and becoming non-selectively Torâh-observant. Doing this he/she is given the title geir toshav (a resident-alien)/geirah toshav by the beit-din, and has a part of ha olam haba as long as he/she is doing his/her utmost to keep Torah non-selectively to his/her utmost (which ha-Sheim requires of all of humankind (see Yekhezqeil (de-Judaized to “Ezekiel”) 18 et.al. in Tan”kh).
The conclusions in the Netzarim-website is in accordance with Tan”kh and the research of the eminent Scholar Louis H. Feldman (Biblical Archeological Review states: “There is simply no one in the world who has a better grasp of Hellenistic Jewish literature than Louis Feldman” , Jew & Gentile in the Ancient World.)